Contact Info / Websites


2009-11-13 09:54:26 by Armagelion

I'm simply curious about how lots of people make it Top30 and even worse, Top5 with an overall shitty produced track? Don't get me wrong.. there are loads of artists on NG who deserve those spots more)

What are the criterias? To asslick as many people as possible so they won't nuke your ass back?

How can NG be improved if there are so little constructive criticism and so many take it personal? We are all here to help each other to improve as artists! That's the point of a community. Instead lots of people think they are awesome producers because of all the neat reviews, that they keep submitting shit!

I can mention some awesome artists on NG who get their tracks zerobombed shortly after submission. Why? What crime did they commit except sharing earcandy? Did they hurt your feelings in a review earlier by speaking from their heart? Or don't you want that song to have a better score than you? Get a grip.. Zerobombers are lame.
Acceptable in reviews with reasons why, but the 0-5 voting poll is bullshit and NOT thought through at all since it basically controls the whole fate of a song. If it hasn't a good score. People won't "discover" it.

I have one theory though.. maybe most users on NG are too young or just so unexperienced that they can't hear what's hot and what's not?

This post isn't flawless. I'm in a hurry and I might have forgotten to mention stuff to back up certain arguements, but I think most of you understand what I'm talking about.
This is by the way not fingerpointed to the current Top5/30, just generally speaking and I may sound a tad harsh.

Keep it up! :)



You must be logged in to comment on this post.


2009-11-13 12:14:08

I agree. Most of the voters on here are shitkids just here for the experience points. This voting system sucks because how good or bad the submission is people will still bomb them with only 0 or 5 votes.